<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blackwell Bible Commentaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bbibcomm.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bbibcomm.net</link>
	<description>The Bible through the centuries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of reception history by The straw men come out to play … with reception history &#124; Church Ministry Center</title>
		<link>http://bbibcomm.net/2011/06/in-defense-of-reception-history/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>The straw men come out to play … with reception history &#124; Church Ministry Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bbibcomm.net/?p=216#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] university, Pepperdine) has penned a longish piece on the actual Blackwell site called ‘In Defense of Reception History’. Hobbins, meanwhile, reckons Heard has ‘corrected’ my little misunderstandings – here at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] university, Pepperdine) has penned a longish piece on the actual Blackwell site called ‘In Defense of Reception History’. Hobbins, meanwhile, reckons Heard has ‘corrected’ my little misunderstandings – here at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of reception history by The straw men come out to play; or, wtf is reception history? &#171; Stalin&#039;s Moustache</title>
		<link>http://bbibcomm.net/2011/06/in-defense-of-reception-history/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>The straw men come out to play; or, wtf is reception history? &#171; Stalin&#039;s Moustache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bbibcomm.net/?p=216#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] university, Pepperdine) has penned a longish piece on the actual Blackwell site called &#8216;In Defence of Reception History&#8216;. Hobbins, meanwhile, reckons Heard has &#8216;corrected&#8217; my little misunderstandings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] university, Pepperdine) has penned a longish piece on the actual Blackwell site called &#8216;In Defence of Reception History&#8216;. Hobbins, meanwhile, reckons Heard has &#8216;corrected&#8217; my little misunderstandings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of reception history by Biblical History</title>
		<link>http://bbibcomm.net/2011/06/in-defense-of-reception-history/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Biblical History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bbibcomm.net/?p=216#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] In defense of reception history &#124; Blackwell Bible Commentaries Last month, the Bible and Interpretation website published an op-ed piece in which Roland Boer comes out &#039;against &#8220;reception history&#8221;&#039; (and, implicitly, the Blackwell Bible Commentaries series for popularizing the term; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In defense of reception history | Blackwell Bible Commentaries Last month, the Bible and Interpretation website published an op-ed piece in which Roland Boer comes out &#039;against &ldquo;reception history&rdquo;&#039; (and, implicitly, the Blackwell Bible Commentaries series for popularizing the term; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of reception history by Around the Blogosphere &#124; Exploring Our Matrix</title>
		<link>http://bbibcomm.net/2011/06/in-defense-of-reception-history/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the Blogosphere &#124; Exploring Our Matrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bbibcomm.net/?p=216#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Heard and Roland Boer disagree about reception history. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Heard and Roland Boer disagree about reception history. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of reception history by Higgaion &#187; In defense of reception history</title>
		<link>http://bbibcomm.net/2011/06/in-defense-of-reception-history/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Higgaion &#187; In defense of reception history</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bbibcomm.net/?p=216#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest on the Blackwell Bible Commentaries website. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest on the Blackwell Bible Commentaries website. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

